[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Performance benchmarks

From: Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 13:16:21 -0400

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Hyrum K Wright <hyrum_at_hyrumwright.org> wrote:

> Very cool to see something which will hopefully give us some
> quantitative measure of performance.
> I've seen people submit reports based on particular revisions.  Would
> it be possible to run the same suite of tools across a number of
> different revisions to give us some sense of change over time?  It'd
> be nice to know if we're getting better or worse, or how particular
> changes impacted performance, etc.
> Just a thought.

Not sure if you have looked at the wiki but I have been posting that
info with the stats for that reason. I figured many of the same
people would just post new results for 1.7 over time and we would
start seeing a pattern of improvement.

I did not go back to some of the older 1.7 revisions to show some of
the recent performance work, but that is something I have considered.

I am currently running the tests to an HTTP server and changing the
server between 1.6 and 1.7. I will post the results when all the
combinations(serf/neon1.6/1.7) are done.

Mark Phippard
Received on 2011-03-28 19:17:42 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.