[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Error with tree conflict data in database after update from 1.6

From: Alan Wood <Alan.Wood_at_clear.net.nz>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 23:52:20 +1300

On 21 Mar 2011 at 10:48, Stefan Sperling wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 12:33:34PM +1300, Alan Wood wrote:
> > There should not have been any conflict data of any sort in this
> > working copy as I am the only developer and I have only every had
> > one working copy.
> That's not a valid assumption.
> It is possible to inflict tree conflicts upon yourself, with only
> one working copy: http://subversion.apache.org/faq.html#self-tree-conflict

Thanks for the link. I had read this a while ago, but forgotton all about it.

> > I hope someone may be able to plug this little hole in the upgrade
> > system.
> Looks like the upgrade code shouldn't insert empty conflict description
> skels into the DB. Can you file an issue that points to this mailing list
> thread, so that this doesn't fall through the cracks? Thanks.

Filed issue# 3840

Sorry for the confusion with the version labels.

> And thanks for testing!
No trouble, would like to have more time for it.


Alan Wood

New Zealand
Phone +64 6 835 4505
Received on 2011-03-21 11:53:02 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.