C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 03/15/2011 10:15 PM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
> >
> > I wonder, why this patch was not considered for fixing issue 3826. I
> > could see a fix 1081799 which I see very similar to what I have
> > done. Did I miss anything here?
>
> No, I simply overlooked your patch by accident. Of course, that was easy to
> do when the issue tracker doesn't point to your patch at all. In the
> future, if you have a patch for an issue, I would suggest that you either a)
> add a comment to the issue tracker which points to your patch's appearance
> on the mailing list, or b) attach your patch to the issue. Then add the
> 'patch' keyword to the issue.
>
> Sorry for the duplicated effort. No offense was intended, to be sure.
Noorul, I'm sorry I didn't answer your last email about your patch.
- Julian
Received on 2011-03-16 17:15:28 CET