Re: [RFC] Children of a replaced node - schedule delete vs. deleted-by-the-replace
From: Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 19:14:20 +0000
Julian Foad <julian.foad_at_wandisco.com> writes:
You haven't got all the cases there. If A included A/L originally then
A/L - scheduled for add (original A/L deleted as a child of A)
From a wcng view A/L is added, not replaced.
> Note that I don't expect to hear anything about the path 'A/F'.
It sounds plausible, although whether there are things that rely on the
-- PhilipReceived on 2011-03-10 20:14:55 CET
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.