[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Subversion trunk (r1078338) HTTP(/WC?) performance problems?

From: John Beranek <john_at_redux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:44:07 +0000

On 10/03/11 14:31, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 6:24 AM, John Beranek <john_at_redux.org.uk> wrote:
>> OK, so I:
>>
>> * Changed my benchmark took to allow the test to be reported N times,
>> and moved to microsecond timers.
>> * Set up a fresh repository on a 1.6.15 server, with no post-commit
>> triggers.
>>
>> So, with 10 iterations:
>> ra_neon: 16.01
>> ra_serf: 15.94
>
> Having only tangentially followed this thread, I've got a couple of questions:
> * Do the current subversion+serf fixes solve the the large checkout
> time problem people have been seeing on trunk?
> * What other scenarios should we be timing/testing?
>
> John, you've been a great help in identifying and testing this. Any
> chance you could run similar timing comparisons on other Subversion
> operations and report the results? :)

OK, well, my script has now been checked in to:

https://github.com/jberanek/svn_scripts

Documentation/usage information isn't great (OK, non-existant) yet, but
I'll work on this.

I've added a checkout test, and here are my results:

1.6.16, 10 iterations, from a localhost trunk(r1080029) server to a
local disc:
ra_neon: 4.49
ra_serf: 5.39

trunk(r1080029), 10 iterations, from a localhost trunk(r1080029) server
to a local disc:
ra_neon: 14.94
ra_serf: 15.76

Cheers,

John.

-- 
John Beranek                         To generalise is to be an idiot.
http://redux.org.uk/                                 -- William Blake

Received on 2011-03-10 16:44:52 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.