On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 17:20, Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Ivan Zhakov <ivan_at_visualsvn.com> wrote:
>>>>  http://serf.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/
>>> Don't the tests show that trunk is slightly faster than 1.6? It seems
>>> like the main thing it shows is that when working with a HTTPv1
>>> server, ra_serf is significantly slower than ra_neon for svn import
>>> (both in 1.6 and trunk).
>> I don't think that this performance degradation is related to HTTPv1
>> or HTTPv2. Looking to the source code ra_serf should faster for most
>> operations except checkout/update/export. It seems something broken in
>> serf/ra_serf in John's environment.
> The reason I mention HTTPv1 is that his tests only showed the problems
> with a 1.6 server. With a trunk server the performance of Serf and
> Neon were similar.
They're similar when running test over localhost. Quoting John:
So, as a comparison, I ran the same tests to a localhost trunk(r1078338)
server. Fedora 14 x86_64, Apache 2.2.17.
But with remote server running 1.6.16:
15 seconds with ra_neon against 2:45 minutes with ra_serf.
Received on 2011-03-08 15:33:20 CET