Re: Breakage on trunk?

On 05/03/2011 20:04, John Beranek wrote:
> On 05/03/2011 18:33, Philip Martin wrote:
>> Stefan Fuhrmann <eqfox_at_web.de> writes:
>>
>>> I suspect that -fstrict-aliasing (or something similar)
>>> might have broken svn_temp_deserializer__resolve().
>>>
>>> r1078256 tries to circumvent that.
>>
>> John should be able to confirm that by testing some revision less than
>> r1078256 using EXTRA_CFLAGS='-O2 -fno-strict-aliasing'

OK, completed full "make check", older code with -fno-strict-aliasing:

FAIL: basic_tests.py 57: ls multiple and non-existent targets
FAIL: basic_tests.py 58: add multiple targets
FAIL: basic_tests.py 59: info multiple targets
FAIL: basic_tests.py 60: blame multiple target
FAIL: cat_tests.py 5: cat should skip uncattable resources
Summary of test results:
  1418 tests PASSED
  40 tests SKIPPED
  54 tests XFAILED (2 WORK-IN-PROGRESS)
  5 tests FAILED

Results of "grep --before-context=10 "^FAIL:" tests.log":
http://pastebin.com/7y3Qjtnz

and with the updated code:

FAIL: basic_tests.py 57: ls multiple and non-existent targets
FAIL: basic_tests.py 58: add multiple targets
FAIL: basic_tests.py 59: info multiple targets
FAIL: basic_tests.py 60: blame multiple target
FAIL: cat_tests.py 5: cat should skip uncattable resources
Summary of test results:
  1418 tests PASSED
  40 tests SKIPPED
  54 tests XFAILED (2 WORK-IN-PROGRESS)
  5 tests FAILED

Results of "grep --before-context=10 "^FAIL:" tests.log":
http://pastebin.com/dtM06GYq

John.

-- 
John Beranek                         To generalise is to be an idiot.
http://redux.org.uk/                                 -- William Blake