On 04/03/11 13:48, Philip Martin wrote:
> John Beranek <john_at_redux.org.uk> writes:
>>> One thing you could try is identifying which revision causes the
>>> problem. I'm guessing that r1072301 will PASS, it would be good to
>>> know which is the first revision to FAIL.
>> Hmm, no - r1072301 FAILs too.
> But it can't be crashing in svn_temp_deserializer__resolve because that
> function doesn't exist in r1072301. That implies it is not the
> serialisation code that is causing the problem.
Argh, apologies - I've got myself confused between different WCs due to
use of 'pushd'. Indeed r1072301 is a PASS!
John Beranek To generalise is to be an idiot.
http://redux.org.uk/ -- William Blake
Received on 2011-03-04 15:03:19 CET
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev