Paul Burba <ptburba_at_gmail.com> wrote on 03/02/2011 10:10:40 AM:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:44 AM, C. Michael Pilato
> <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
> > On 03/02/2011 10:40 AM, kmradke_at_rockwellcollins.com wrote:
> >> "C. Michael Pilato" <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote on 01/28/2011
01:44:26 PM:
> >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix for issue #3789 log -g regression in
r1028108
> >>>
> >>> On 01/26/2011 05:59 PM, Kevin Radke wrote:
> >>> > This also needs a back-port to the 1.6.x branch.
> >>> >
> >>> > [[[
> >>> > Fix issue #3789: Correctly ignore missing locations when a
> renamed file
> >>> > has more than MAX_OPEN_HISTORIES.
> >>> >
> >>> > * subversion/libsvn_repos/log.c
> >>> > (get_path_histories): Ignore more bogus repository
> locations to restore
> >>> > pre-1.6.15 log -g behavior. This fixes
> >>> client chunk
> >>> > errors introduced by r1028108.
> >>> > ]]]
> >>>
> >>> Committed this in r1064839 with tweaks to the log message. (Rather
than
> >>> open a new issue, I just reopened issue 3270). Will propose for
> backport to
> >>> 1.6.x, too. Thanks, Kevin.
> >>
> >> Was this ever proposed for backport? (Or am I just missing it in
STATUS?)
> >>
> >>
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS?view=markup
> >>
> >> This does fix a regression introduced with 1.6.15...
> >
> > Pretty confident that it did. I believe it's the "More fixes for
issue
> > #3270" item in CHANGES on the 1.6.x branch.
>
> Scratch "pretty confident" and insert "certain":
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1072344
Excellent. Thanks for double checking this. (And thanks for not slapping
my hand too hard for not looking in the CHANGES file... :))
Kevin R.
Received on 2011-03-02 17:15:07 CET