Yes, please file an issue, and in the meantime I'll re-add it to my
list. (There are a few things ahead of it...)
Thanks!
Daniel
Gavin Beau Baumanis wrote on Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 21:29:27 +1100:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Just checking as to whether or not you think you'll be able to get to this submission or not, please?
> I'm more than happy to log it into the Issue Tracker, if you feel that time is getting the better of you.
>
>
>
> On 08/01/2011, at 5:08 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
> > I'll add it to my list, but as I'll have to read the whole thing before
> > answering it might take a while until I'll answer.
> >
> > If anyone else wants to beat me to it...
> >
> >
> > Erik Johansson wrote on Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 22:43:43 +0100:
> >> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 19:15, Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> >>> I can't find a summary anywhere in your mail. Is the summary "Here is
> >>> a work-in-progress patch that revvs the struct and adds a mod_props
> >>> member, and below are the specific semantics I'm thinking of for that
> >>> member; please review those semantics"?
> >>
> >> Yes it is, sorry for leaving that out. I was trying to get all the
> >> cases right that I totally forgot to add a summary. I'm interested in
> >> getting your input on the implementation and what you think about the
> >> proposed semantics.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> // Erik
> >>
> >> --
> >> Erik Johansson
> >> Home Page: http://ejohansson.se/
> >> PGP Key: http://ejohansson.se/erik.asc
>
Received on 2011-02-22 14:49:44 CET