Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 11:21:10AM +0000, Philip Martin wrote:
>> Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> writes:
>>
>> > But I think there is value in seeing the error message in the test code.
>> > It makes it much easier for those reading the test code to follow
>> > what kind of error the test is expecting. If all people can go by
>> > is the error code, then they'll have to keep looking up error codes
>> > to understand what the test is trying to do.
>> > I think that's worse than adjusting tests when the message changes
>> > every once in a while.
>>
>> For those reading the test code a comment could be used, although I
>> admit that a comment is less reliable. On the other hand, if we just
>> check error numbers that might make it possible to run the regression
>> tests in some locale other than C, and some language other than English.
>
> Sure but is that something we really need? After all this would mean
> testing gettext, which we don't maintain.
We have got this far without it, but it would be interesting to try it.
The regression tests depend on lots of things we don't maintain BDB,
libxml, etc.
--
Philip
Received on 2011-02-21 12:58:42 CET