Re: FSFS format 6

On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 22:37, Stefan Fuhrmann <eqfox_at_web.de> wrote:
> The fopen() calls should be eliminated by the
> file handle cache. IOW, they should already be
> addressed on the performance branch. Please
> let me know if that is not the case.
>
Just my 20 cents.

My belief that file handles cache should be implemented at OS level
and I pretty sure that it's implemented. And right way to eliminate
number of duplicate fopen()/reads() is improving our FS API.

I didn't reviewed how file handles cache is implemented in
fs-performance branch, but I'm nearly to -1 against implementing cache
of open file handles in Subversion.

-- 
Ivan Zhakov