[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Bindings use is *painful*

From: André Malo <nd_at_perlig.de>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:49:00 +0100

* Hyrum K Wright wrote:

> I'm writing a script in which I simply want to retrieve a set of
> arbitrary log message and then do stuff with them. Using the Python
> bindings seemed like the logical choice (whether is was or not is now
> debatable, but that isn't the point of this mail). Turns out that
> using the Python bindings is a *painful* experience,

Back then, when using them, I often ended up looking through the generated
swig sources to get essential information about how exactly something was
mapped. So it was basically about at least 4 editor windows on the screen:
my script, some header file(s), the generated swig sources, the
implementation of the mapped function(s).

It was painful, yes, but also fascinating. I learned a lot about the whole
subversion code ;-)
Granted, that's not helpful if you just want to get something done fast...


>kann mir jemand sagen, was genau @-Domains sind?
Ein Mythos. Ein Werbetrick. Verarsche. Nenn es wie du willst...
                 -- Alexandra Buss und Björn Höhrmann in dciwam
Received on 2011-02-16 21:49:38 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.