No, I didn't mean it to sound harsh. I assumed that, having already
captured the data in wireshark, it would be straightforward to get
wireshark to decompress it or dump it to a file.
Thanks for jumping in and correcting me.
Daniel
Julian Foad wrote on Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:58:22 +0000:
> On Wed, 2011-02-16, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Keith Palmer Jr. wrote on Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 16:26:19 -0500:
> > >
> > > I tried to capture the traffic with Wireshark, but it appears that
> > > everything is compressed over the wire anyway... so I can't tell if
> > > I'm looking at just compressed data, or compressed+encrypted data.
> >
> > Decompress it then?
>
> Daniel, I'm sure you didn't mean that to sound harsh but it does to me!
> Decompressing it might be quite difficult to arrange, practically, and
> it was quite reasonable for Keith to enquire here before going to that
> effort.
>
> Thanks for your "depends on the SASL module" answer a few minutes later.
>
> - Julian
>
>
Received on 2011-02-16 14:03:37 CET