Re: #3641 vetoed
From: Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:41:14 +0000
Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name> writes:
>> My veto for r962377+r962378 was based on the test showing that the
Good, you can remove the veto.
-- PhilipReceived on 2011-02-16 12:41:56 CET
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.