[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: #3641 vetoed

From: Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:41:14 +0000

Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name> writes:

>> My veto for r962377+r962378 was based on the test showing that the
>> implementation was not correct. Are you proposing to merge those 3
>> revisions as well and make the test PASS?
>
> Yes.

Good, you can remove the veto. 

-- 
Philip
Received on 2011-02-16 12:41:56 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.