[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

#3641 vetoed

From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 19:15:33 +0200

Philip,

You vetoed the r962377 group since descend_into_replace() is XFail.

I've un-xfailed that test in these commits:
3485 * 11Jan26,02:35 danielsh_at_apache.o (2.5K) svn commit: r1063572 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/
3486 * 11Jan26,02:39 danielsh_at_apache.o (2.2K) svn commit: r1063573 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_repos/replay.c
3489 * 11Jan26,03:32 danielsh_at_apache.o (1.0K) svn commit: r1063592 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/svnsync_tests.py

Does your veto stand?

Thanks,

Daniel
Received on 2011-02-14 18:20:41 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.