Okay, I've fixed a problem in libsvn_repos. And I've reworked this test
into something at least ... meaningful.
On 02/08/2011 03:20 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Yeesh. I find Ruby incredibly difficult to read, but I'm fairly certain
> that this test is bogus in many ways. The "target" passed to
> svn_repos_begin_report() was never supposed to be anything but a relpath.
> From it's docstring:
>
> @a target is a single path component, used to limit the scope of the
> report to a single entry of @a fs_base, or "" if all of @a fs_base
> itself is the main subject of the report.
>
> So that part's bad. When I fix that, I get errors about the non-existence
> of "/base". And as far as I can tell, "/base" is in fact non-existent in
> the test repository, having never been created there.
>
> So... I'll just keep trying to make this test make some sense.
>
>
> On 02/08/2011 12:22 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> I'll look into these.
>>
>>
>> On 02/08/2011 11:36 AM, Philip Martin wrote:
>>> The buildbot is red:
>>>
>>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/svn-x64-ubuntu%20gcc/builds/1514/steps/Test%20bindings/logs/stdio
>>>
>>> The Ruby bindings are triggering the new fspath asserts. The problem occurs in
>>> test_report and test_report2 in:
>>>
>>> subversion/bindings/swig/ruby/test/test_repos.rb
>>>
>>> I can fix the asserts by doing
>>>
>>> Index: subversion/bindings/swig/ruby/test/test_repos.rb
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- subversion/bindings/swig/ruby/test/test_repos.rb (revision 1068325)
>>> +++ subversion/bindings/swig/ruby/test/test_repos.rb (working copy)
>>> @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@
>>> def assert_report
>>> file = "file"
>>> file2 = "file2"
>>> - fs_base = "base"
>>> + fs_base = "/base"
>>> path = File.join(@wc_path, file)
>>> path2 = File.join(@wc_path, file2)
>>> source = "sample source"
>>> @@ -405,7 +405,7 @@
>>> :revision => rev,
>>> :user_name => @author,
>>> :fs_base => fs_base,
>>> - :target => "/",
>>> + :target => "",
>>> :target_path => nil,
>>> :editor => editor,
>>> :text_deltas => true,
>>>
>>> but although the tests now run they fail.
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
Received on 2011-02-08 22:52:52 CET