On Monday 31 January 2011 08:49 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 01/31/2011 10:05 AM, Arwin Arni wrote:
>> On Monday 31 January 2011 08:01 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>>> On 01/31/2011 04:48 AM, Arwin Arni wrote:
>>>> Should I add parameters for options / values / options& values to decide
>>>> the case or shall I use a common parameter for all(sections, options&
>>>> values) ?
>>> We generally try to avoid premature over-engineering, and at the moment, we
>>> have no known need for the additional changes you speak of. Introducing
>>> codepaths that we don't exercise can lead to surprise failures later when we
>>> do.
>> But I am excercising it!
>>
>> In libsvn_repos/authz.c. I'm using it to make the config population
>> case-sensitive. (Issue #3781)
> Unless I'm mistaken, your immediate need is to make *section* parsing
> case-sensitive. Nothing about issue #3781 calls for toggle-able case
> handling of options or values. *That's* the "additional changes" stuff I'm
> referring to.
>
Oh! Okay.. It was originally Kamesh's idea to do this.. so.. I guess
I'll have to get back to you after a few more words with him..
Thanks for the feedback..
Regards,
Arwin Arni
Received on 2011-01-31 16:43:17 CET