Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> I'd rather not remove their entries entirely from COMMITTERS.
+1. Being unable to contact them (currently) is a completely different
thing from deciding to remove them from the list of committers. And
failure to keep one's email address up to date is not a serious breach
of committership responsibilities, for an inactive or infrequent
committer, I'd say.
> Just remove the (now-bogus) email addresses perhaps?
Only if you're sure the email addresses are permanently defunct and not
merely temporarily rejecting our attempts to contact them.
> Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 17:08:34 -0500:
> > Well... we could try to find new/updated email addresses. Because of
> > the committers' open source work, I bet they can be tracked down...
> > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 15:12, Hyrum K Wright <hyrum_at_hyrumwright.org> wrote:
> > > Question: if emails are bouncing, that almost certainly means these
> > > folks have not filed CLAs, and in which case, they don't have commit
> > > access anymore. Should we just remove them from COMMITTERS?
> > >
> > > -Hyrum
Received on 2011-01-28 12:04:51 CET