[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [serf-dev] Re: What stands between us and branching 1.7?

From: Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 15:09:51 +0100

On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 02:41:49PM +0100, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Justin Erenkrantz <justin_at_erenkrantz.com>wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Lieven Govaerts <svnlgo_at_mobsol.be> wrote:
> > >> Greg or Lieven, any thoughts here? -- justin
> > >
> > > At least the one rev that fixes this issue, don't know if the other are
> > > already working in all scenario's.
> > > I'll look at it this weekend and make a release.
> >
> > Woohoo. Thanks. I'll be sure to test it. Let me know if you need
> > any help. -- justin
> >
>
> I've prepared branch 0.7.x with the changes that are safe to go in serf
> 0.7.1.
>
> I'm running some tests on Linux, Windows 7 and Mac Os X. On the latter svn
> trunk currently doesn't build for me (is_atomicity_error symbol not found),
> but doesn't seem to be related to serf.
>
> I'd appreciate some more testing, before I make the release later this week.
> The code to get is:
> http://serf.googlecode.com/svn/branches/0.7.x at r1427.

The svn-openbsd-i386 buildbot is using serf 0.7.x. The working copy
isn't updated automatically, but I've just removed it so it should get
a fresh checkout during the next build and run all tests with the
newest serf.

Stean
Received on 2011-01-23 15:10:39 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.