Hi Daniel,
Being a non SVN dev I am certainly not in a position to review your patch..
But being a developer, none the less, that prescribes to Test Driven Development I have to say,
Why Fight it?
Occam's razor?
Beau.
On 09/01/2011, at 2:42 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> [ issue #3705 is the "corruption that fsfsverify fixes" issue. ]
>
> One of my old todo notes from issue #3705 is to flush proto rev files.
> Looking into the code, I came up with the following.
>
> Does that look right? It seems too short to be the real fix.
>
> [[[
> Index: ../libsvn_fs_fs/fs_fs.c
> ===================================================================
> --- ../libsvn_fs_fs/fs_fs.c (revision 1056454)
> +++ ../libsvn_fs_fs/fs_fs.c (working copy)
> @@ -795,8 +795,11 @@ get_writable_proto_rev_body(svn_fs_t *fs, const vo
>
> /* Now open the prototype revision file and seek to the end. */
> err = svn_io_file_open(file, path_txn_proto_rev(fs, txn_id, pool),
> - APR_WRITE | APR_BUFFERED, APR_OS_DEFAULT, pool);
> + APR_WRITE, APR_OS_DEFAULT, pool);
>
> + /* Disable buffering. See notorious issue #3705. */
> + apr_err = apr_file_buffer_set(*file, NULL, 0);
> +
> /* You might expect that we could dispense with the following seek
> and achieve the same thing by opening the file using APR_APPEND.
> Unfortunately, APR's buffered file implementation unconditionally
> @@ -2029,7 +2032,7 @@ open_and_seek_transaction(apr_file_t **file,
> apr_off_t offset;
>
> SVN_ERR(svn_io_file_open(&rev_file, path_txn_proto_rev(fs, txn_id, pool),
> - APR_READ | APR_BUFFERED, APR_OS_DEFAULT, pool));
> + APR_READ, APR_OS_DEFAULT, pool));
>
> offset = rep->offset;
> SVN_ERR(svn_io_file_seek(rev_file, APR_SET, &offset, pool));
> ]]]
>
> Daniel
> (why disable buffering? I don't remember, but I could refresh my
> memory using the issue and IRC logs.)
Received on 2011-01-08 23:34:50 CET