[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn_fs_commit_txn and svn_repos_fs_commit_txn inconsistency

From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 21:44:12 +0200

Daniel Shahaf wrote on Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 20:40:02 +0200:
> Blair Zajac wrote on Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:16:56 -0800:
> > 4) In svn_repos_fs_commit_txn(), which order should errors be composed?
> > svn_fs_commit_txn()'s error as the parent followed by the
> > SVN_ERR_REPOS_POST_COMMIT_HOOK_FAILED error as a child? This seems to be
> > the standard ordering of chained errors. On the other hand, it makes it
> > harder to find a post-commit script error.
> Actually, it will make it impossible to detect post-commit errors over
> ra_dav, since that RA layer marshals only the outermost error code in an
> error chain.

This is now <http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3767>.

(Details are partly from memory, partly from quick testing I re-did today.)
Received on 2010-12-21 20:47:08 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.