[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn_fs_commit_txn and svn_repos_fs_commit_txn inconsistency

From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 22:21:10 +0200

Philip Martin wrote on Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 19:59:37 +0000:
> Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name> writes:
>
> > Blair Zajac wrote on Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 11:14:34 -0800:
> >>
> >> Shouldn't svn_repos_fs_commit_txn() always run the post-commit hook if
> >> new_rev is a valid rev?
> >>
> >
> > That matters when NEW_REV is a valid rev but there is a non-SVN_NO_ERROR
> > return value. When can that happen?
>
> Packing or rep-caching processing after the new rev is created.
>

Agreed that (in both of these cases) running the post-commit hook anyway
would make sense.

> --
> Philip
Received on 2010-12-20 21:24:06 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.