Re: issue 3486 should be reopened?

From: Gavin Beau Baumanis <gavinb_at_thespidernet.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 09:14:09 +1100

On 27/11/2010, at 12:46 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 02:45:07PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 02:40:07PM +0100, Peter Parker wrote:
>>> On 13.11.2010 16:07, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>>> Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 14:35:13 +0200:
>>>>> Attached the non-windows version of your script I used for testing.
>>>> [ SNIP ]
>>> So as Daniel has same error on trunk, is it possible to reopen issue 3486 ?
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Peter
>>
>> Yes please. That assertion should never be hit.
>> Thanks for reporting this.
>>
>> Stefan
>
> PS: Is your name really Peter Parker? That's awesome!

Hmmm.. My "spidey-senses" are telling me "There's a bug in there, somehwere."

Gavin "Beau" Baumanis
Received on 2010-11-28 23:15:02 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Prabhu Gnana Sundar: "[PATCH] enhance "svn diff" by adding "--diff-copy-from" switch"
Previous message: Danny Trebbien: "Re: [PATCH] extend svn_subst_translate_string() to record whether re-encoding and/or line ending translation were performed (v. 2)"
In reply to: Stefan Sperling: "Re: issue 3486 should be reopened?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]