[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r1036686 - /subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS

From: Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 10:52:48 +0000

"Hyrum K. Wright" <hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu> writes:

> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Paul Burba <ptburba_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> So unless somebody has a fix coming soon for issue #3641, I think we
>> should either backport r1036429 or veto it *and* revert  r962378.  The
>> third option, leaving  r962378 but not backporting r1036429 seems the
>> worst of all worlds, since we are introducing an assert.
> The current 1.6.15 already has a number of important fixes that I'm
> eager to get into our users' hands. If there isn't an iminent fix for
> this issue, let's back out r962378 from the branch, and reroll
> (hopefully today?)

I agree.

Received on 2010-11-24 11:53:31 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.