(This doesn't appear to have come through to the list after a day, so
I'm resending it from a different MUA.)
On 01/11/10 15:56, Philip Martin wrote:
> The name should be AuthzSVNReposRelativeAccessFile for consistency with
> It should be an error to specify both AuthzSVNAccessFile and
> AuthzSVNReposRelativeAccessFile similar to SVNPath/SVNParentPath.
> Perhaps it should be a path rather than a boolean?
I've addressed all these comments, including this one to convert the
argument to be a path rather than a boolean.
New patch is:
Implement AuthzSVNReposRelativeAccessFile to allow SVNParentPath to use
a different authz configuration file for each repository.
(get_access_conf): Check if AuthzSVNReposRelativeAccessFile is used,
and if so, load the authz file from inside the repository being
accessed rather than one which is statically configured in the
(subreq_bypass, access_checker, check_user_id, auth_checker):
Recognise that it's valid not to have a AuthzSVNAccessFile if
AuthzSVNReposRelativeAccessFile is used.
Introduce functions to ensure AuthzSVNAccessFile and
AuthzSVNReposRelativeAccessFile are not used at the same time.
Received on 2010-11-03 12:01:58 CET