On 30.10.2010 17:01, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Looks like at least one test fails:
>
> [[[
> lp-shahaf,14:svn/performance% ../runctest fs fs 22
> subversion/tests/libsvn_fs/fs-test.c:3411: (apr_err=160000)
> subversion/tests/libsvn_fs/fs-test.c:3229: (apr_err=160000)
> svn_tests: Error validating revision 1 (youngest is 3)
> subversion/tests/svn_test_fs.c:492: (apr_err=160000)
> svn_tests: Repository tree does not look as expected.
> Corrupt entries:
> A/D/G/rho
> Missing entries:
> Extra entries:
>
> FAIL: lt-fs-test 22: after each commit, check all revisions
> zsh: exit 1 ../runctest fs fs 22
> ]]]
>
> I haven't tested yet whether it's due to the commits this morning or to
> something else.
Hm. The tests run fine here. But I'm testing with FSFS only
and I'm using plain "make -j && make check" with no magic
environment variables set.
> Stefan, can you guess what might be causing this?
>
This is typically caused by stream_readline() not detecting
or handling EOF properly. You could try to replace just that
function with /trunk code and see what happens.
> Also: how to detect this when it happens next? When I was working on
> the atomic-revprops branch I asked to add it to the buildbot, perhaps we
> should be doing this more regularly (for our feature branches) too?
+1 for that. The closer we come to a 1.7 release, the more
import it will be to have a certain level of confidence that
the patch sources aren't broken.
-- Stefan^2.
Received on 2010-10-30 18:04:48 CEST