[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r1024394 - /subversion/site/publish/packages.html

From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 23:00:59 +0200

Greg Stein wrote on Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 15:17:39 -0400:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 08:42, Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> >...
> > As the page stands now, the "professionally supported and certified" is
> > just lots of words that add nothing over "maintained by".  And
> > information-freeness is Bad.
>
> I disagree on this one. "Maintained by Jeremy Whitlock" says something
> *very* different from "professionally supported by X".
>

What does it add over going to the maintainer's page and seeing if
they're doing this as a hobby or as a business plan?

For example, if I were to produce binaries for the public, what difference
would it make whether or not I labeled them as "professionally supported
and certified"?

>
> (the "certified" thing has been a bit weird to me for a while, but not
> enough to push more than occasionally)
>
> Cheers,
> -g
Received on 2010-10-29 23:02:38 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.