On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 16:42, Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> C. Michael Pilato wrote on Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:11:20 -0400:
>> On 10/27/2010 09:41 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> > 2. Let's think about users: they have different needs for Subversion:
>> > just a client, client and server etc. There are different packages to
>> > get Subversion to be installed and running. Some comes with just a zip
>> > archive, others have some installation and configuration scripts.
>> > That's what customers looking for.
>> >
>> > 3. From my point of view, it is more important for users to explicitly
>> > mark packages that requires registration and email for download.
>>
>> Agreed. There's no need for our package descriptions to be anemic to the
>> point of uselessness. Let the descriptions state exactly what folks will be
>> getting (objectively -- this is not a playground for Marketing departments).
>> I also agree that it makes sense to note those downloads for which
>> "Registration is required". As a user, I'd want to know that stuff up
>> front, too.
>>
>
> +1 to this direction.
>
I've added note to the packages that requires registration in r1028656.
--
Ivan Zhakov
Received on 2010-10-29 11:30:23 CEST