Re: svn commit: r1022931 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc: status.c wc-queries.sql wc_db.c wc_db.h

On 10/15/2010 05:26 PM, Bob Archer wrote:
>>>> - cold cache: 1.7 is almost 50% faster than 1.6
>>>> 1.7: 22s
>>>> 1.6: 42s
>>>>
>>>> - hot cache: 1.7 is just about on par with 1.6 (only 20% slower)
>>>> 1.7: 0.86s
>>>> 1.6: 0.72s
>>>>
>>>
>>> What do you guys mean by "cold cache" and "hot cache"? If they
>> mean what I think they mean, wouldn't "hot cache" be faster that
>> "cold cache" ?
>>
>> I think they are what you think. 22 seconds is slower than < 1s,
>> isn't it?
>>
>
> DOH! I missed the .86s v 22s ... it's Friday afternoon... that is my excuse.

Don't sweat it. Hey, with some luck, you're Saturday and Sunday will run
slower than usual, too. I hear that works wonders on the mind.

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand