[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: migration to NODES

From: Julian Foad <julian.foad_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 18:25:50 +0100

On Fri, 2010-09-24, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 11:16, Julian Foad <julian.foad_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
> >...
> > I think we should produce a test framework that can give us a WC
> > containing all the different possible WC states. Then we can write
> > tests against this framework, some tests that test specific state, and
> > other tests that apply the same operations to all the states and check
> > that it works in all the states that it should.
> This requires a manual process of thinking of all states and all
> permutations. I don't trust it.

This kind of testing is more about checking that the design is
implemented and that the code paths are exercised ...

> If we could somehow capture working copies from during normal test
> runs, *then* I think we'd have "everything". We can easily get the
> terminal state for each test, which is a great first step. It would be
> great if we could also get the intermediate steps.

... while this kind is more about checking for regression or unwanted
changes of behaviour. The two approaches are complementary.

> Haven't thought much about it, but my thoughts were somewhere along that line.

> > I have been thinking this for a while. As yet I've just got a
> > rudimentary constructor for a WC containing (nearly) all *base* states.
> > Not changes, yet. Here it is:
> Not sure if it solves everything, but it is a good start. Review below:

Thanks for the review comments. All useful.

- Julian
Received on 2010-09-27 19:26:33 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.