Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote on Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 01:48:18 +0530:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Daniel Shahaf writes:
> > Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 16:49:08 +0200:
> > > 0:/tmp/svn% $svnrdump dump file://$PWD/r1/trunk/A/B 2>&1 | grep Node-path
> > > Node-path: trunk
> > > Node-path: trunk/A
> > > Node-path: trunk/A/B
> > > Node-path: trunk/A/B/E
> > > Node-path: trunk/A/B/E/alpha
> > > Node-path: trunk/A/B/E/beta
> > > Node-path: trunk/A/B/F
> > > Node-path: trunk/A/B/lambda
> > >
> > > Nice :-)
> > >
> >
> > Is it? If I try to dump a subdir, then I /shouldn't/ get a "Create
> > /trunk" entry in the dumpfile... instead, it should be the user's
> > business to create that directory in the target repository out of band,
> > before loading the dump into it.
>
> svnrdump behaves exactly like svnsync in this manner.
svnsync allows you to sync a subdir of a repository (i.e.,
svnsync $REPOS/trunk/A/B $MIRROR
), but does it also create /trunk/A/B in the mirror?
But for now I still think that svnrdump invocation I quoted above
shouldn't have outputted a 'create /trunk' entry in the dumpfile :-).
@all, what do you think?
> See the tests
> only_trunk_dump, only_trunk_A_with_changes_dump, and
> descend_into_replace_dump that I imported from svnsync. They all
> exercise this subdirectory feature. Maybe the tests are not
> exhaustive?
>
> -- Ram
Received on 2010-09-26 23:06:01 CEST