[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svnmucc multiline property issue

From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 18:35:32 +0200

C. Michael Pilato wrote on Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:27:35 -0400:
> On 09/24/2010 08:46 AM, Geoff Rowell wrote:
> > Is it too late to backport it for the upcoming release?
>
> It's not about the timing, really. We don't introduce new features in patch
> releases. Now, that said, svnmucc isn't really part of our core product, so
> perhaps it doesn't fall into this restriction. I wonder what other devs
> think about this?

I'm fine with backporting patches that, formally, add a new feature
(e.g., a new --option flag), given that they are localized and not
overly invasive. (I wouldn't support a backport that adds a new feature
but rewrites half of the internals.)
Received on 2010-09-24 18:36:50 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.