C. Michael Pilato wrote on Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:27:35 -0400:
> On 09/24/2010 08:46 AM, Geoff Rowell wrote:
> > Is it too late to backport it for the upcoming release?
> It's not about the timing, really. We don't introduce new features in patch
> releases. Now, that said, svnmucc isn't really part of our core product, so
> perhaps it doesn't fall into this restriction. I wonder what other devs
> think about this?
I'm fine with backporting patches that, formally, add a new feature
(e.g., a new --option flag), given that they are localized and not
overly invasive. (I wouldn't support a backport that adds a new feature
but rewrites half of the internals.)
Received on 2010-09-24 18:36:50 CEST