[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r997905 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/libsvn_wc/entries-compat.c

From: Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 21:40:36 +0100

Erik Huelsmann <ehuels_at_gmail.com> writes:

> We're now back to a single failure. It's in the relocation-verification code
> in db-test.c (line 1505). With the half-hour I've spent so far, I wasn't
> able to locate it, but I have to move to other business now. Hopefully
> you'll be able to find it.

It's the difference between the old STMT_UPDATE_BASE_RECURSIVE_REPO
and the new STMT_RECURSIVE_UPDATE_NODE_REPO. The first updates
non-null repo_ids while the second updates repo_ids that match the old
repo_id. This makes a difference when a node has a non-null repo_id
that doesn't match the the old repo_id.

I'm not sure whether the pre-relocate db is valid, and if it is I'm
not sure which of the relocate algorithms is correct.

Received on 2010-09-16 22:41:22 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.