Re: [PROPOSAL] WC-NG: merge NODE_DATA, WORKING_NODE and BASE_NODE into a single table (NODES)

"Hyrum K. Wright" <hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu> writes:

> Sure, but is this "bring us back to parity with 1.6" work, or is it
> "new stuff we can do with wc-ng" work? If the former, it's certainly
> a release blocker. If the latter, I'm not so sure....

We currently have a regression from 1.6, wc-ng cannot record the
revert-base when a child of a copied directory is replaced:

svn cp wc/A wc/X
svn rm wc/X/f
svn cp wc/g wc/X/f # 1.7 has only one row to store text-base and revert-base

-- 
Philip