[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Another FSFS bug somewhere?

From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 18:29:41 +0300

John Szakmeister wrote on Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 07:09:43 -0400:
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 6:48 AM, Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> wrote:
> > Given what I know about the scenario at the customer site, there seems to
> > be a correlation between revprop edits and corruption of revisions,

FWIW, r981921 makes sure rev files in new repositories are created
read-only, and is nominated for backport.

(Hmm... Now I realize it does not affect existing repositories, unless
the admin manually chmods -w the youngest rev file.)

> > John, if you had time for a quick IRC session where you could explain
> > the ideas behind fsfsverify.py to me at a high level and answer questions,
> > I'd be grateful. And I'd very much like to see its functionality inside
> > of svnadmin verify/recover, partly because I believe that reimplementing
> > it there would give me great insight into the problem :)
> I can do that. My schedule is a bit wonky though. Early morning
> Eastern Standard Time works best for me (I'm usually up 4:30ish). Let
> me know what works for you.

I'd love to join such an IRC session.

> -John
Received on 2010-09-02 17:33:20 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.