Re: Do we want 'svn patch' to be able to add empty files?
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 02:09:03PM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 02.09.2010 13:25, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > For now, an svn symlink will show up as an empty file when the patch is
> > applied with git. I don't think that's a huge problem. Nice to have, but
> > not release critical for Subversion.
> That's not how I read the patch ... I believe git will create a file
> whose contents are "link foo" given the example patch in this thread.
Yes, you're right. Thanks for correcting.
But still not a release-critical problem.
Received on 2010-09-02 14:39:31 CEST
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev