[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Enabling Single-DB mode today

From: Hyrum K. Wright <hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:34:48 -0500

On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Julian Foad <julian.foad_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
>> Bindings: swig-py, swig-pl, swig-rb all pass their tests.  ctypes-python
>> fails to build for me.  Java: Philip said "I've run javahl tests in
>> single-db, 3 FAILs compared to 1 in multi-db."
>
> When I ran JavaHL tests a week or so ago in single-db mode the only
> failing tests were ones where the test expected a local directory
> delete to leave the directory on disk.  So we should just have to
> adjust the test expectations after conversion.

Mark, will you update the JavaHL test expectations when the
switch-over occurs? (Note that there is still one failure due to
r990916.)

> +1 from me on the upgrade.

+1 from me as well.

-Hyrum
Received on 2010-08-31 17:35:28 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.