Re: Enabling Single-DB mode today
On 08/31/2010 10:36 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> Bindings: swig-py, swig-pl, swig-rb all pass their tests. ctypes-python
> fails to build for me. Java: Philip said "I've run javahl tests in
> single-db, 3 FAILs compared to 1 in multi-db."
> Upgrading from a dev version: When the switch is made, after updating
> and re-compiling, each dev using a trunk WC (format 18) will need to run
> tools/dev/wc-ng/bump-to-19.py on the WC.
> Running the new svn on an format-18 WC will report a friendly message
> advising you to use bump-to-19.py. (Running it on an older 1.7-dev
> (format <= 17) WC will probably upgrade one directory to format 18 and
> then exit with that message, which doesn't sound quite right.)
> Running an old svn on a format-19 (single-db) WC results in a friendly
> I think we're all set to switch it on.
Ooh. Wait a second. I seem to recall that your Python script had some
limitations -- couldn't handle externals, or something. Is that still the
case? Can it be worked around by something like:
1. rm -rf /path/to/external/directory
3. svn up
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
Received on 2010-08-31 16:42:21 CEST
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev