[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Upgrade from 1.6 must use the same incremental steps? [was: svn commit: r987526 - ...]

From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 21:14:26 +0300

Greg Stein wrote on Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 14:11:21 -0400:
> I wish you wouldn't change the subject line so often.

Why not? It has proper References: and In-Reply-To:. Should be enough
for threading to work, no?
Received on 2010-08-22 20:17:32 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Daniel Shahaf: "Re: [PATCH] add docstrings to libsvn_ra_neon's 207 XML parser"
Previous message: Daniel Shahaf: "Re: svn commit: r987869 - /subversion/branches/performance/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/temp_serial izer.c"
In reply to: Greg Stein: "Re: Upgrade from 1.6 must use the same incremental steps? [was: svn commit: r987526 - ...]"
Next in thread: Justin Erenkrantz: "Re: Upgrade from 1.6 must use the same incremental steps? [was: svn commit: r987526 - ...]"
Reply: Justin Erenkrantz: "Re: Upgrade from 1.6 must use the same incremental steps? [was: svn commit: r987526 - ...]"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.