On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 04:59:00PM +0100, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 11:39 AM, <stsp_at_apache.org> wrote:
> > Author: stsp
> > Date: Fri Aug 20 10:39:27 2010
> > New Revision: 987454
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=987454&view=rev
> > Log:
> > * site/publish/roadmap.html
> > (release-status): Instead of having one big WC-NG item and several other
> > items that are related to WC-NG, mark items related to WC-NG, and drop
> > the big WC-NG item.
> >
> > Modified:
> > subversion/site/publish/roadmap.html
> >
> > Modified: subversion/site/publish/roadmap.html
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/site/publish/roadmap.html?rev=987454&r1=987453&r2=987454&view=diff
> > ==============================================================================
> > --- subversion/site/publish/roadmap.html (original)
> > +++ subversion/site/publish/roadmap.html Fri Aug 20 10:39:27 2010
> > @@ -296,28 +296,35 @@ numbering, compatibility, and deprecatio
> > <a href="http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3565"
> > >issue #3565</a>, which depends on conflict storage.</td>
> > </tr>
> > - <tr class="in-progress">
> > - <td>New Working Copy Library (WC-NG)</td>
> > - <td>In Progress</td>
> > - <td>Issue 3357</td>
> > - </tr>
> > <tr class="in-progress" style="margin-left: 25px;">
> > - <td>Enable single-db on trunk</td>
> > + <td>Enable single-db on trunk
> > + (<a href="http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3357"
> > + >WC-NG</a>)
> > + </td>
> > <td>In Progress</td>
> > <td></td>
> > </tr>
> > <tr class="in-progress" style="margin-left: 25px;">
> > - <td>Conversion to the NODE_DATA table</td>
> > + <td>Conversion to the NODE_DATA table
> > + (<a href="http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3357"
> > + >WC-NG</a>)
> > + </td>
> > <td>In Progress</td>
> > <td></td>
> > </tr>
> > <tr class="not-started" style="margin-left: 25px;">
> > - <td>Conflict storage</td>
> > + <td>Conflict storage
> > + (<a href="http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3357"
> > + >WC-NG</a>)
> > + </td>
> > <td>Not Started</td>
> > <td></td>
> > </tr>
> > <tr class="not-started" style="margin-left: 25px;">
> > - <td>Upgrade to single DB</td>
> > + <td>Upgrade to single DB
> > + (<a href="http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3357"
> > + >WC-NG</a>)
> > + </td>
> > <td>Not Started</td>
> > <td>Conversion script
> > for devs exists, but end-user single-db upgrade not started</td>
> >
> >
> >
>
> I noticed you left the "margin-left: 25px;" style in on those
> subitems. The goal was to list WC-NG (since that's the big feature
> the *everybody* knows is going to be in 1.7), and then split out a
> bunch of subitems, somehow denoting that they are part of the parent
> item. My css-fu wasn't good enough to effectively denote that
> graphically.
Ah, I see.
> I still think it is useful to have the various master items, as well
> as sub-items in various stages of completion. It helps both
> developers and on lookers understand what's planned to be in the
> release, and what needs to be done (and how one can contribute).
> Having the WC-NG master item helps a lot in external communication.
Yes, that would be a nicer way of presenting it.
We can revert that commit and apply proper CSS-fu (but I don't have
enough CSS-fu part either).
Stefan
Received on 2010-08-21 11:59:32 CEST