I normally moderate messages through quite actively, but have been
remiss this week. IOW, "normally" messages shouldn't ever hang out for
very long. I slacked off this week, thinking others would pick up the
slack. Guess I was wrong :-P
More moderators never hurts, of course. For those wondering, I think
the moderation load is 5-10 messages a day. A simple Reply-All and
"send" is all that is required (to moderate through, and to put the
person on the "allow" list so future messages do not require
moderation).
Cheers,
-g
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 13:52, Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> Daniel Shahaf wrote on Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 20:51:08 +0300:
>> @all, do we need more moderators on users@?
>
> By the way, exactly the same people moderate dev@ and users@. (i.e.,
> users-owner@ and dev-owner@ both go to the same 4 people.) So I imagine
> that, inasmuch there is a problem, it would apply to both lists.
>
> Daniel
> (the dev@ moderation queue currently contains only one message, which is
> only an hour old)
>
Received on 2010-08-19 20:40:09 CEST