[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: dev@ and users@ need more moderators?

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:39:09 -0400

I normally moderate messages through quite actively, but have been
remiss this week. IOW, "normally" messages shouldn't ever hang out for
very long. I slacked off this week, thinking others would pick up the
slack. Guess I was wrong :-P

More moderators never hurts, of course. For those wondering, I think
the moderation load is 5-10 messages a day. A simple Reply-All and
"send" is all that is required (to moderate through, and to put the
person on the "allow" list so future messages do not require


On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 13:52, Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> Daniel Shahaf wrote on Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 20:51:08 +0300:
>> @all, do we need more moderators on users@?
> By the way, exactly the same people moderate dev@ and users@.  (i.e.,
> users-owner@ and dev-owner@ both go to the same 4 people.)  So I imagine
> that, inasmuch there is a problem, it would apply to both lists.
> Daniel
> (the dev@ moderation queue currently contains only one message, which is
> only an hour old)
Received on 2010-08-19 20:40:09 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.