[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r981989 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/status.c

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 14:32:18 -0400

On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 14:02, <rhuijben_at_apache.org> wrote:
> Author: rhuijben
> Date: Tue Aug  3 18:02:00 2010
> New Revision: 981989
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=981989&view=rev
> Log:
> * subversion/libsvn_wc/status.c
>  (get_dir_status): Following up on r981893, remove !Single-DB block and an
>     inaccurate comment. Hidden is not a parent-stub status.

I'm not sure this message is correct. Hidden can certainly be a
parent-stub status. For a not-present directory (entry->deleted), it
is "hidden".

I suspect in this case, wc_db reads the stub and returns not-present.
But it *is* reading the stub, so maybe your log message should say
something different? (and verify the code *is* doing what I
hypothesize)

Cheers,
-g
Received on 2010-08-03 20:32:57 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.