Re: Callbacks, prompts, etc. for issue 2779

On 30.07.2010 13:57, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 07/30/2010 03:55 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>
>> That approach just doesn't sound right to me. I've always understood
>> that a temporary redirect implies that requests should always try the
>> original first. Since there's no concept of a session in HTTP, you can't
>> really assume anything about how long a redirect is valid -- it may be
>> only for one single request and not for others.
>>
> What do you think Subversion should do when it encounters a temporary
> redirect, then?
>
Follow the redirect but not record the new URL in the working copy metadata.

-- Brane
Received on 2010-07-30 14:18:18 CEST