[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r959954 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc.h

From: Joe Swatosh <joe.swatosh_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:50:15 -0700

On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Bert Huijben <bert_at_qqmail.nl> wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Joe Swatosh [mailto:joe.swatosh_at_gmail.com]
>> Sent: vrijdag 30 juli 2010 1:46
>> To: dev_at_subversion.apache.org; julian.foad_at_wandisco.com
>> Subject: Re: svn commit: r959954 -
>> /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc.h
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 4:28 AM,  <julianfoad_at_apache.org> wrote:
>> > Author: julianfoad
>> > Date: Fri Jul  2 11:28:39 2010
>> > New Revision: 959954
>> >
>> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=959954&view=rev
>> > Log:
>> > Enable the pristine text store: bump the WC format to 17 and define
>> > SVN_EXPERIMENTAL_PRISTINE.
>> >
>>
>> Hi Julian,
>>

>>
>
> (Just reading this mail. Will look into this tomorrow if nobody fixed it
> before)
>
> Looks like changed5.txt and changed7.txt have the same checksum here. (The
> result of 'echo ""  ' put into the file)
>
> That add-s checksum isn't recorded in the database yet during post commit,
> when the delete operation is performed so the delete determines that the
> pristine can safely be removed because nobody is looking at it?
>
>
> Joe, thanks for diagnosing!
>
>        Bert
>

Hi Bert (or whoever may look into this before tomorrow),

I was working on two sets of test failures and screwed up on when
things started. This failure actually started in r964036.
(Probably the same as reported by Hyrum
http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2010-07/0293.shtml).

Sorry for the initial mislead :-(

--
Joe
Received on 2010-07-30 03:50:54 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.