Re: GSoC Progress report

On 28.07.2010 21:55, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Stefan Sperling wrote on Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 16:05:49 +0200:
>
>> But there's no harm in making svn patch interpret existing move information
>> in git diffs. We can carry out a corresponding copy + delete.
>> We won't be generating move git diff headers ourselves, but we should
>> be interoperable with git diff and hg diff as much as we can.
>>
> hg diff? I don't recall hearing of 'hg diff' on this list before... are we
> trying to be able to parse 'hg diff' output as well? Or how does 'hg diff'
> come into the picture?
>

IIRC Mercurial uses git-compatible diff format these days.

-- Brane
Received on 2010-07-29 11:00:50 CEST