Re: Proposal: Rename svnrdump

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Bob Archer <Bob.Archer_at_amsi.com> wrote:
>> We used to be brutal against adding flags let alone separate
>> binaries,
>> so why are we so willing to add new binaries willy-nilly?  To me,
>> as
>> an admin, it just makes *so* much sense that a remote dump feature
>> be
>> tied into "svnadmin dump".  -- justin
>
> I agree this makes sense.
>
> You could also argue svnmcc should be part of svn.

I personally think that some features of svnmucc are/will move to svn
proper. The primary reason they aren't there today is because the
implementation wasn't in a stable state, or we didn't want to support
these experimental APIs forever. Some of the functionality has shown
lasting usefulness, and I think those are likely candidates for
inclusion in the core project.

-Hyrum
Received on 2010-07-26 19:47:42 CEST