[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r966774 - /subversion/branches/issue-2779-dev/subversion/libsvn_client/update. c

From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 21:53:02 +0300

Stefan Sperling wrote on Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 20:11:23 +0200:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 07:59:42PM +0200, Bert Huijben wrote:
> > Shouldn't we relocate the complete working copy, starting by the working copy root instead of just the operation anchor?
>

So "cd notes; svn up commit-access-templates" would relocate my entire trunk wc?

At the least, this departs from current semantics of svn. I won't speak for
"many users", but I, for one, would be surprised if svn started touching the
parent of the dir I specified as target.

If this change is made, can we please add the appropriate big red letters
somewhere?

> I'm thinking a callback mechanism to ask users if they really
> want to relocate to the new URL would be nice. And I agree that
> the entire working copy should be relocated (should be easy in WC-NG,
> right? :)
>
> Stefan
Received on 2010-07-22 20:54:38 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.