[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: svn commit: r966381 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c

From: Bert Huijben <bert_at_qqmail.nl>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 22:15:03 +0200

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rhuijben_at_apache.org [mailto:rhuijben_at_apache.org]
> Sent: woensdag 21 juli 2010 21:44
> To: commits_at_subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r966381 -
> /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c
> Author: rhuijben
> Date: Wed Jul 21 19:44:05 2010
> New Revision: 966381
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=966381&view=rev
> Log:
> * subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c
> (svn_wc__db_upgrade_apply_props): Store the base_props in
> not (never!) the revert props.

This last commit and the few previous (r966279, r966300 (fixes missing #endif) and more important r966313), fixed the last few remaining issues on upgrading to in-db properties.

We still have the issue #2530 error, that makes the upgrade from 1.4.0 with specific replacement schedules fail (upgrade_tests.py 8). This test was specifically added to trigger this issue, so I think we can just mark it XFail until we know how to handle this.

I think we are ready to switch to in-db properties now. If nobody objects, I would like to switch to in-db properties tomorrow, by switching to WC-format 18.

@gstein: Can you please confirm that you read this mail and if possible review these revisions?

Received on 2010-07-21 22:15:55 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.