Re: Do we better tolerate obstructed updates?

From: Hyrum K. Wright <hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:34:46 +0100

On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 03:07:30PM +0100, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>> Could you file the issue?
>
> Sure: http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3680
>

Thanks. I've commented out the failing tests (swig-rb and JavaHL lack
a XFail directive), and noted them and the relevant revisions in the
issue tracker.

-Hyrum
Received on 2010-07-13 16:36:26 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Stefan Sperling: "Re: [PATCH] svn status ^/ foo: The node '/path/to/wc/foo' was not found."
Previous message: Stefan Sperling: "Re: Do we better tolerate obstructed updates?"
In reply to: Stefan Sperling: "Re: Do we better tolerate obstructed updates?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]